|
March 2009, Volume 23, Issue 1 - Are You a Sucker or a Jerk? |
|
|
|
Originally published in the Advocate in February 1993. By Jim Prickett
At an Association meeting in 1987 while I was still hourly faculty, I discussed the dilemma we face in holding office hours. The contract states that hourly faculty are not required to hold office hours. Nevertheless, I believed then (and now) that students are entitled to have instructors who hold regularly scheduled office hours. Should I, then, hold uncompensated office hours?
If I held office hours without being paid, I felt like a sucker, since I knew that the district was relying on hourly faculty to perform uncompensated labor.
But if I denied office hours to my students, I felt like a jerk, since I believed students were entitled to them.
Some faculty believe that holding office hours is a professional responsibility even if not compensated. (Holding office hours as a flex activity is a possible, backhanded way of obtain-ing compensation.) Others believe that holding office hours was unprofessional. They argue that our willingness to hold unpaid office hours make it less likely that the district would ever mandate and compensate office hours.
There’s really no correct response to the sucker-jerk dilemma, since neither is acceptable. The real way out of this false, District-created dilemma is a pro rata pay scale so that instructors would be required to hold, and be compensated for, office hours.
The Cervisi Decision has finally become incorporated into EDD routine, and unemployment insurance for any period for which you are not being paid to teach is routinely available. And under the current contract part-timers are being paid for some office hours, and soon will be paid exactly pro-rata to full-timers, making us neither suckers nor jerks.
|